Bring employee pulse, onboarding and team feedback into a repeatable listening process. Build the questions your organisation needs, collect scores with written explanations and give authorised colleagues a shared basis for reviewing the evidence. Help HR and team leaders decide which workplace processes to investigate and what to ask in the next feedback round.
Feedback rounds use different questions and scattered files, making recurring workplace concerns difficult to revisit.
Keep agreed questionnaires, submitted feedback and reviewed findings together for each listening round.
New colleagues describe onboarding issues informally, leaving the team with an incomplete basis for improving the process.
Collect consistent onboarding ratings and explanations at the stages your organisation chooses to review.
The team needs a structured way to explain process friction before agreeing which working practices to improve.
Use focused questions and reviewed feedback to support a practical discussion about the next team change.
Use these existing workflows to connect your team’s task with a result it can review and use.
Choose a focused set of agreement, score and open-text questions about the workplace processes you want to understand. Repeat the agreed questions across defined listening rounds.
Recognise recurring concerns within the respondents reached and give HR a consistent basis for follow-up.
Collect feedback at the onboarding stages your organisation defines. Ask about clarity, access to resources and remaining questions, then review the written explanations.
Identify the parts of onboarding that need investigation and bring new colleagues’ feedback into the next process review.
Ask focused questions about a team process or planned workplace change. Give permitted reviewers the project access they need and compare compatible feedback rounds.
Support discussions about the change with collected evidence and clear questions for the next review.
Your workflow brings analysis and quality review together in the same workspace. Match the published plan allowances and optional AI credits to the work your team needs.
Ask questions across approved fields, compare relevant groups and organise written responses. Review field meanings, filters, statistical assumptions and supporting answers, then save analyses for the next team discussion.
Compare recorded scores within an approved reporting scope and organise employee comments into reviewed themes. Keep source comments available for human review before bringing a finding into a team decision.
Provider-assisted dataset questions require workspace enablement, a configured provider, permission and credits. Review the analysis and sampled text themes before using them in a decision.
Investigate configured quality findings, assign follow-up and record review decisions. Apply approved corrections in tracked batches, retain the original submissions and reconsider derived corrections through rollback.
Investigate inconsistent response patterns and keep reviewer decisions available before preparing a team finding. Review approved corrections alongside the original answers and the reasons for the changes.
Quality flags guide investigation and depend on the available collection metadata. Corrected values are retained separately; submission exports currently contain the original answers.
Repeated employee listening needs reusable questionnaires, sufficient response capacity and controlled access for the colleagues reviewing it. A Team workspace supplies its published allowances for that process. Compare the subscription price with the time your organisation spends preparing rounds, organising feedback and assembling evidence for workplace improvement discussions.
Loading published plan prices…
Use these measures to evaluate your own improvement. They are not promised customer results.
Choose the workplace process and employees you want to hear from. Agree the questions, privacy notice, appropriate reporting scope and which colleagues may review responses.
Publish the tested questionnaire and share it with the selected employees. Review incoming records, investigate quality findings and organise comments with shared codes and optional AI assistance.
Review the evidence with the authorised colleagues responsible for the process. Decide what to investigate or improve and reuse compatible questions in the next listening round.
Configure the questionnaire, respondent access and reporting scope for your organisation. Project permissions do not guarantee anonymous responses or automatic small-group suppression. This workflow does not connect automatically to an HRIS or make employment or performance decisions; your organisation reviews the evidence and manages follow-up.
Choose the service, compare the current plan and test the workflow with your team.
Discuss your team’s requirementsBuild a form for your next survey, application or feedback request. Collect responses in one workspace and give your team a clear place to review them.